<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3247171317808202855.post2375424399041815463..comments</id><updated>2007-09-07T21:19:40.329-07:00</updated><category term='SolidDB'/><category term='Openfiler'/><category term='gridlayer 3Tera'/><category term='mysqltoolkit'/><category term='OCFS2'/><category term='OurDelta'/><category term='RAC'/><category term='MySQL'/><category term='NDB Cluster'/><category term='LVM'/><category term='MySQL proxy'/><category term='Replication'/><category term='Benchmark'/><category term='DBA Kata'/><category term='Maatkit'/><category term='popular'/><category term='Slave'/><category term='Error'/><category term='Oracle'/><category term='Multi-Master'/><category term='EC2'/><category term='mysqlslap'/><category term='roadmap'/><title type='text'>Comments on DBA Dojo: MySQL 5.1 NDB Cluster on EC2 testing redundancy</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://blog.dbadojo.com/feeds/2375424399041815463/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3247171317808202855/2375424399041815463/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.dbadojo.com/2007/07/mysql-51-ndb-cluster-on-ec2-testing.html'/><author><name>roobaron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08420801903669108937</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='25' height='32' src='http://static.flickr.com/35/65473653_e73dfa530b_m.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3247171317808202855.post-5861706291576575700</id><published>2007-09-07T21:19:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2007-09-07T21:19:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>Potentially yes. I reread the manual on this &lt;a hr...</title><summary type='text'>Potentially yes. I reread the manual on this &lt;A HREF="http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/mysql-cluster-nodes-groups.html" REL="nofollow"&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;concept&lt;/A&gt; and you can partition the data as required.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;What I was demostrating for that test was having 4 replicas of the data on 4 data nodes, rather than partitioning the data into 2 partitions, each with 2 data nodes as suggested in that </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3247171317808202855/2375424399041815463/comments/default/5861706291576575700'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3247171317808202855/2375424399041815463/comments/default/5861706291576575700'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.dbadojo.com/2007/07/mysql-51-ndb-cluster-on-ec2-testing.html?showComment=1189225140000#c5861706291576575700' title=''/><author><name>roobaron</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08420801903669108937</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='25' height='32' src='http://static.flickr.com/35/65473653_e73dfa530b_m.jpg'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.dbadojo.com/2007/07/mysql-51-ndb-cluster-on-ec2-testing.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3247171317808202855.post-2375424399041815463' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3247171317808202855/posts/default/2375424399041815463' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-915895263'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3247171317808202855.post-3599771766681938930</id><published>2007-09-06T02:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2007-09-06T02:27:00.000-07:00</updated><title type='text'>You say that having to store the complete database...</title><summary type='text'>You say that having to store the complete database in memory limits the size of the database, both physical limits and cost. But as far as I know, MySQL is capable of storing different parts (fragments) of the data on different nodes, so physically it should be possible with a db size larger than memory size on each node, provided you have enough nodes, right? The cost of running the nodes, on </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3247171317808202855/2375424399041815463/comments/default/3599771766681938930'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3247171317808202855/2375424399041815463/comments/default/3599771766681938930'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://blog.dbadojo.com/2007/07/mysql-51-ndb-cluster-on-ec2-testing.html?showComment=1189070820000#c3599771766681938930' title=''/><author><name>Øyvind</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05508521402696308721</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://blog.dbadojo.com/2007/07/mysql-51-ndb-cluster-on-ec2-testing.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3247171317808202855.post-2375424399041815463' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/3247171317808202855/posts/default/2375424399041815463' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-462408649'/></entry></feed>
