tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3247171317808202855.post2741765837865860062..comments2008-03-28T05:41:50.483-07:00roobaronhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08420801903669108937noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3247171317808202855.post-21040305591094614752008-03-27T04:45:00.000-07:002008-03-27T04:45:00.000-07:00

Correct me if I'm wrong, but there isn't a small difference between the sysbench test and the seeker one. They are completely in opposition.<BR/><BR/>Sysbenching the /mnt mount point shows that /mnt is far slower than the root partition.<BR/><BR/>The seeker executable shows that the /mnt points is a lot faster.<BR/><BR/>So which test should I believe ?<BR/><BR/>I plan to use the large, x-large

fredericsidlerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06050568139001127587noreply@blogger.com